|
Post by janinesherman on Jan 26, 2016 14:43:24 GMT -5
So when I was reading the article by Shanahan on disciplinary literacy I could not exactly grasp the difference between content-area literacy and disciplinary literacy. I found this article very helpful in explaining the point to non-experts... ssnces.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/file/view/10What+Is+Disciplinary+Literacy+and+Why+Does+it+Matter.pdf"The difference is that content literacy emphasizes techniques that a novice might use to make sense of a disciplinary text (like how to study a history book for an exam), while disciplinary literacy emphasizes the unique tools that the experts in a discipline use to participate in the work of that discipline." Content-area literacy assumes that the same reading skills and strategies can be used across the content areas, however this is not always true. The skills that you use to read a novel are entirely different than the skills needed to navigate a mathematical equation. The example that made me have an a-ha moment about this new term "disciplinary literacy" was talking about how students in science classrooms often use mnemonic devices or memorization strategies to understand new science term. The disciplinary approach would be to take apart the word for its Latin or Greek roots to understand why the science term is named that way, this strategy can then by applied to other words. This is an example I found. If i was learning terminology I would find this approach a lot more helpful than simply memorizing an exhaustive lists of terms. peri + card + itis (prefix) (root) (suffix) around heart inflammation
|
|
|
Post by hannahhiester on Jan 26, 2016 20:49:56 GMT -5
Does this mean that content literacy applies only to text? For example, can it be extended to interpreting a model or standard representation? Also, could content literacy be viewed as one type or subset of disciplinary literacy?
|
|
|
Post by taylorbelleglaze on Jan 27, 2016 14:43:59 GMT -5
Janine, I very much like your example explaining a disciplinary approach for the science field. While reading more about disciplinary literacy, I went to google images to look up what they had to say about this key word. I came across this image: www.hcpss.org/f/academics/ms_program/levels.gifThis image shows the break up of the different age levels and the comprehension skills that they achieve with literacy. With disciplinary literacy, I do believe that someone has to achieve this understanding of being able to think critically and move past the surface level of what they are trying to look at. For instance, in my content area (English), high school teachers try to push their students to look past just the words on the page in literature. It's more than just a few sentences that are grammatically correct and "make sense." What makes sense to one is not what makes sense to another. We create our own meanings and reasons in our mind of what this literature means. In elementary school, teachers may try to teach their students how to read and understand the words within the text. This is called basic or intermediate literacy. Once we have created this basis of our "common knowledge" per say or what words mean, we eventually move onto this deeper level of disciplinary literature.
|
|
|
Post by alicenburnett on Jan 27, 2016 15:00:20 GMT -5
Content literacy does not apply solely to text. If you googled content literacy this definition would pop up: "Content literacy is the ability to read, write, create, interpret and present a range of media, in subjects such as science, social studies and mathematics." Literacy can be linked to anything a student would write or read in any given day: billboard, text message, TV commercial, etc. I think that you could say disciplinary literacy is a subsection of content literacy since you're pairing the skills of the content area with the ability to read, write, and think critically.
|
|
kasee
New Member
Posts: 21
|
Post by kasee on Jan 27, 2016 15:40:07 GMT -5
 Taylor, thanks for sharing the image! It helped me to grasp the concept better, so I have also included this one since it provides examples for different content areas.
|
|
|
Post by parkerh13 on Jan 27, 2016 17:03:20 GMT -5
So is disciplinary literacy the example Dr. Boggs told us about the spark plug? That I wouldn't understand how to figure out what is wrong with it but if a mechanic looked at it he would know exactly what is wrong with it and be able to fix it?
|
|
|
Post by hannahhiester on Feb 1, 2016 11:58:40 GMT -5
In your example parkerh13, you hit on two parts that I think are important for disciplinary literacy: both understanding and knowing what to do about it, knowledge and practice if you will. For me the mechanic is disciplinary literate as he has the tools and knowledge to first look at the spark plug and diagnose the problem and second to fix the problem. In the same way a English major may look at a paragraph and be able to diagnose why it is not grammatically correct or doesn't convey the message correctly and then be able to edit it accordingly. From the definition janinesherman shared, I would say that someone with content literacy would know what can go wrong with a spark plug but may not be able to recognize the problem if presented with the spark plug or be able to fix it. What do you all think?
|
|
|
Post by felishadake on Feb 1, 2016 21:04:39 GMT -5
I agree with you Hannah. To build off of what you said, I would say that someone with content area literacy would use what they are familiar with to make sense of the problem. Someone with an English content area literacy would likely use the techniques familiar to them, such as searching for books that explain spark plugs and their purpose. Someone with disciplinary literacy would know exactly what tools to use, understand the composition of the spark plug, and apply what they know to fix it.
|
|
|
Post by lindseynharrell on Feb 2, 2016 13:07:04 GMT -5
Felisha, your explanation was super helpful to me! Thank you!
|
|